Freaky Weather and Global Warming

Superstorm Sandy — the Midwestern drought of 2012 — the February 2013 Midwestern blizzards — record flooding in China, Brazil and the Philippines — Europe’s deepest cold snap in 25 years — record drought in Africa. Are these extreme weather events of the past year isolated occurrences, or is there a connection? Recent studies support the view that increasing CO2 levels, global warming, and extreme weather are closely linked.

A study conducted in Antarctica by a team of scientists from the National Research Center of France, published in the February 28 2013 issue of the journal Science, suggests that CO2 increases in the past have triggered global warming periods that melted glaciers. The French team examined ice cores drilled in Antarctica over the past 30 years. They focused on ice from 20,000 to 10,000 years ago, the last period when the planet warmed naturally and glaciers melted. By measuring the concentration of nitrogen-15 isotopes throughout the ice cores, they found that carbon dioxide increase and global warming happened at virtually the same time – between 18,000 and 11,000 years ago. This confirms the position of most climate scientists that rising temperatures and CO2 increase are locked in a feedback loop. CO2 brings higher temperatures, and higher temperatures lead to more CO2 being released from deep oceans and melting permafrost, further increasing temperatures.

According to a new study by scientists at the Potsdam Institute for Climate Impact Research in Germany, to be published in the journal National Academy of Sciences, and summarized in the February 28, 2013 issue of the journal Science, “Global weather is normally influenced by waves of air that oscillate between Earth’s tropical and Arctic regions, alternately pulling warm air up from the tropics to northern climes, then bringing cold air down from the Arctic.” As a result of global warming, however, these waves are now getting stuck in their tracks. Instead of bringing cool air after a warming period, the heat just stays, sometimes for weeks or months. Normal warm-cold oscillation depends on a stable difference in temperature between a cold Arctic and warm tropics. But the Arctic is warming much faster than the rest of the world, narrowing the temperature difference and reducing the airflow between the two areas. The study suggests that these stalled wave formations explain the increasing number of extreme weather events, such as the prolonged Midwestern drought of 2012.

A new climate model developed by scientists at NOAA’s Geophysical Fluid Dynamics Laboratory and Princeton University predicts that rising CO2 levels over the next century will bring a dramatic decline in snowfall for the continental United States. Carbon dioxide content in the air has increased 40% since the mid-19th century and could double by the end of the century. The model suggests that as CO2 levels rise and global temperatures increase, less snow will fall in temperate regions. This spells trouble for areas such as the western U.S. that depend on snowmelt for fresh water. In North America, the greatest snowfall reductions will occur in the northeast, the mountains of the west, and coastal regions from Virginia to Maine. These areas are projected to get less than half the snow they currently receive. In very cold regions of the globe, however, snowfall will rise. As Arctic air warms, it holds more moisture, leading to increased precipitation in the form of snow. The Arctic, Antarctic, and the high peaks of the Himalayas, the Andes, and the Yukon will get much more snow. In other words, the unpopulated remote areas of the world will get more rain and snow, while the heavily populated regions will see less precipitation and more drought.

With the world facing this kind of climate future, it appears more urgent than ever to try forestalling it by cutting way back on CO2 emissions. That means replacing fossil fuel energy with solar, wind, and other alternative energy sources as quickly as possible. But if we shrug our shoulders and keep on burning fossil fuels, there’s every reason to believe the conditions predicted by this research will come to pass: a world with higher temperatures, less rain, less snow, more air pollution, more drought, and the occasional violent weather event thrown in. It seems worth the effort to do everything we can to hold it off.

 

2012 Natural Disaster Review

Natural disasters resulting in death and damage in 2012 included earthquakes in Iran, floods in Romania, typhoons in the Philippines, avalanches in Afghanistan, flash floods in India, earthquakes and landslides in China, and drought and hurricanes in the United States.

2012 was the warmest year on record In the continental U.S. according to a January 8, 2013, report issued by NOAA’s National Climatic Data Center. Average nationwide temperature in 2012 was 55.3°F (13°C), 3.2°F above the 20th Century average. The average U.S. temperature in July was the hottest ever recorded in a single month.  61% of the U.S. experienced drought conditions in 2012. Wildfires in Western U.S. charred 9.2 million acres.

In a report released by Munich Re, the world’s largest reinsurer, 9.500 people died in natural disasters in 2012, slightly below the 10-year average of 106,000. Natural disasters caused estimated overall losses of $160 billion, and $65 billion in insured losses. However Munich Re’s overall loss figure may be too low. Based on a December 21, 2012, article in The Guardian, loss estimates for Hurricane Sandy alone approach $100 billion, and Midwestern drought losses could be as much or more.

Figures released by NOAA on December 20, 2012, report that in 2012 there were 11 weather and climate events in the U.S. that reached the billion-dollar threshold in losses. Total losses could exceed $200 billion.

Weather and climate related insurance losses have doubled every decade since the 1980s. The insurance industry believes it will save money in the future by investing today in global warming education and ways to reduce the impact of natural disasters. A study published in the December 13, 2012, issue of the journal Science states that the insurance industry is investing $23 billion in emissions-related technologies and climate change mitigation. 129 insurance firms from 29 countries are supporting a program of climate research, reducing greenhouse gas emissions, raising public awareness of the emissions threat, and incorporating climate change into investment decisions.

A draft of the 2013 Climate Assessment Report compiled by a panel of 240 scientists for a federal advisory committee has been released for peer review. The report says the evidence tells an unambiguous story: the planet is warming. It predicts the impact of global warming on the nation’s health and infrastructure will be severe. Among the panel’s findings: U.S. average temperature has increased 1.5°F since 1895, 1.2° of that increase occurring since 1980; the next few decades are projected to see another 2 to 4° temperature rise; global sea level has risen 8 inches (20.32cm) in the past 100 years and is projected to rise another 2 to 4 ft this century; ocean surface waters have become 30% more acidic as they absorb large amounts of CO2 from the atmosphere, threatening the survival of coral and shellfish.

With no limits or controls imposed by the international community on CO2 emissions from the burning of fossil fuels, there is little doubt that the rapid pace of global warming will continue, bringing with it hotter weather, longer droughts, heavier storms, accelerated polar ice melt, rising sea levels, coastal flooding, acidic oceans, compromised fisheries, unhealthy air, and erratic rainfall. That appears to be our future unless there is a major worldwide effort to reduce CO2 emissions by replacing a big part of carbon-based energy with green energy.

Landsat: Mapping a Changing Earth

Orbiting NASA satellites Landsat 5 and Landsat 7 record images of earth’s surface 24 hours a day, every day of the year. The collected data is sent to a ground station where it is processed and reorganized into color maps and released to the public on the internet. Landsat 5 was launched 29 years ago, and is finally being retired and returned to earth due to a failing gyroscope. Landsat 7 placed in orbit in 1999 is still flying and still sending back earth surface image data. It will be joined by state-of-the-art Landsat 8 to be launched in February, 2013.

How high and how fast? The Landsat satellites orbit at an altitude of 440 miles (705km). They make one complete orbit every 99 minutes, flying north-south around earth’s two poles. They record images in strips 115 miles (185km) wide as the earth rotates beneath it. The satellites make a complete coverage of the earth every 16 days. Five passes cover the entire United States, from Maine to California, and Alaska to Hawaii.

How does Landsat see? The Landsats use digital scanning  devices that map the earth in amazing detail. To quote NASA, “Landsat sensors record reflected and emitted energy from earth in various wavelengths and electromagnetic spectrum.” The sensors record earth’s energy in blue, green, and red in the visible spectrum.  For example, Landsat 5 recorded a picture of Arizona’s Wallow fire in 2011, showing burn scars in red, active fire in bright red, smoke in blue, vegetation in green, bare ground in tan, and water in dark blue. This real-time information can help fire crews identify hot spots and more efficiently deploy resources.

What does Landsat see? According to NASA, Landsat data have been used to monitor water quality, glacier and ice sheet recession, sea ice movement, invasive species encroachment, coral reef health, land use change, deforestation rates, and population growth.  Landsat has also been used to track the progress of hurricanes, and helped to assess damage from storms, fires, floods, and tsunamis. Since Landsat 1 was launched in 1972, the Landsat program has given us a 40-year record of the effects of a changing climate, tracking the progress of melting ice caps, rising sea levels, disappearing islands, eroding coastlines, and high-altitude forest changes.

Who uses Landsat mapping? Farmers use Landsat to project crop yields. Landsat data was used to assess the total yield of the Soviet wheat crop in 1979 before the harvest. The forecast came within 90% of the official figures released months later. World bodies such as the UN, and national and local governments, use Landsat data to forecast future change, and plan mitigation measures against natural disasters. Businesses use Landsat to plan future production and distribution based on population growth and relocation. Universities and national labs use Landsat data in research projects. Ecological groups use Landsat to monitor CO2 emissions, harmful chemicals in the air and water, plant and animal survival and migration, and deforestation.

Between 2003 and 2009, Landsat recorded an amazing amount of rainforest destruction in Peru. 12,500 acres (5,058 hectares) of forest were destroyed during that period. When officials investigated, they found that unlicensed miners were rushing into this area to mine for gold. They were not only clearing and defacing the land, but bringing mercury to the mining sites to extract gold from the rocks. The mercury was seeping into the water table, and dangerous amounts of mercury vapors were filling the air. International groups have been working with the Peruvian government to correct the problem.

The Landsat program is a joint venture between NASA and the U.S. Geological Survey. NASA flies the satellites, and USGS processes the data and releases it to the public in mapping form.   

 

 

Are We Slowing Global Warming?

Are measures such as making cars more fuel efficient, recycling waste, producing wind and solar energy, and other green practices helping in the fight against global warming? It’s probably too early to tell for sure, but there are some encouraging developments, and some not so encouraging.

On the plus side, a study published in the August 23, 2012, issue of the journal Nature indicates that the amount of atmospheric methane, a greenhouse gas far more potent than CO2, has leveled off after climbing for the first 80 years of the 20th Century. It is believed that the main reason for this is the recapture of escaping natural gas that occurs during oil production.

Up until the 1980s, the petroleum industry vented or flared the natural gas that comes out of the ground with the oil during drilling. Natural gas is composed of 90% methane, and millions of tons of it were pouring directly into the atmosphere. By trapping the natural gas and using it to speed up well production and run machinery, the oil industry is reducing air pollution and operating more efficiently in the bargain.

Improved agricultural practices such as producing high-yield crops, and setting aside unused acreage for grassland and forest, have also served to reduce methane release into the air.

In another positive development, the U.S. Dept. of Energy released a report showing that in the first 4 months of 2012, CO2 emissions in the United States fell back to 1992 levels, a 20-year low. Conversion of hundreds of power plants from coal to natural gas was given as the primary reason.

On the minus side, although CO2 and methane emissions are going down in the U.S., they keep climbing in China and other developing countries, where coal is still used almost exclusively for producing power and running factories. China, the world’s top CO2 emitter, now sends 30% more CO2 into the atmosphere than the U.S.

Despite the progress in the U.S. in reducing greenhouse gasses, the parts per million of CO2 in the planet’s atmosphere keeps climbing. The latest 2012 reading from the Mauna Loa Observatory is 392 ppm, a historic high, and moving us closer to the 400 ppm mark that some scientists believe will be the tipping point toward an ice-free and much hotter world. Will the green efforts in the developed world prove to be too little, too late, or will the developing countries follow suit soon enough to help slow down the impact of global warming? Time will tell.

 

 

An Ice-Free Arctic Ocean?

Arctic sea ice is melting at a record rate, according to figures released by the National Snow & Ice Data Center in Colorado Springs. On August 13, 2012, the extent of sea ice in the Arctic Ocean had fallen 2.69 square kilometers (1.97 million square miles) below the 1979-2000 average for the same date, and 483,000 sq. km (186,000 sq. mi) below the same date in 2007, the previous record low year. The data was supplied by the European Space Agency’s radar-equipped satellite Cryoset, launched in 2010 to monitor changes in the thickness of arctic sea ice.  Measurements from overflying aircraft and sonar buoys confirm the Cryoset figures.

With two weeks still to go in the arctic melt season, NASA scientists believe that arctic sea ice will drop to its lowest point ever recorded. Computer models developed by scientists at NASA’s Goddard Space Flight Center project an ice-free Arctic Ocean during the summer months by 2035. According to the model, Arctic ice will become seasonal, allowing ships to sail the fabled Northwest Passage “over the top of the world” for a good part of the year. Some Chinese container ships have already started using the shortened route to ship goods directly to Europe and U.S. East Coast ports.

Not only are the boundaries of the Arctic ice cap shrinking, but the ice is thinning in some areas. In the past decade alone, sea ice thickness north of Greenland has fallen 65%, from 5 to 6 meters (16 to 20 ft) to 2 meters (6.6 feet).

As the Arctic ice melts faster, and the fall freeze continues to start later, there will be less ice to reflect the sun’s rays back into space, which allows the sun to heat the Arctic Ocean water. A warmer Arctic Ocean will contribute to sea level rise and warmer oceans worldwide, and overall global warming. Aquatic  wildlife species that depend on sea ice and colder water will disappear. Humans will have to adjust to rising ocean levels around the world, plus a warmer climate  with longer, hotter droughts and more destructive floods and storms.

Earlier Spring Threatens Species’ Survival

The warming of the planet has advanced the date when plants leaf and flower in the spring by up to 6 days in some locations, creating a potential mismatch between the hatching of butterflies, bees, and other animals, and the availability of the food sources they depend on. If  these conditions prevail in the future, some species could suffer great population loss, or even disappear altogether.

An example is a species of Rocky Mountain butterfly, which has been studied by biologist Carol Boggs of Stanford for the last 40 years. The earlier flowering of a variety of alpine wildflower that the butterfly depends on puts the plant at greater risk of frost damage, which can leave the butterfly without the food it needs to sustain it, endangering the species’ population.

Most of us think of the first day of spring as March 20, the vernal equinox, the day when daylight and darkness are equal in length. But to phenologists — scientists who study the life cycle of plants and animals — the first day of spring is the first day that leaves appear on plants.

According to studies conducted by Dr. Mark D. Schwartz of the University of Wisconsin, “first leaf” spring in the contiguous 48 U.S. states is now appearing an average of 3 days earlier than in the recent past: going from March 20 (1950-1980 average) to March 17 (1981-2000 average).

The difference ranges from 5-6 days early in northern states where winters are colder, to 1-2 days early in California, Texas, and some southeastern states where winter weather is more moderate.

A study by Elizabeth Wolkovich of UC San Diego and Benjamin Cook of NASA’s Goddard Space Flight Center arrives at a similar conclusion. They compared an archive of worldwide long-term observations of 1,158 species of wild plants on four continents with results of their plant warming experiment. They varied the temperature around small plots of plants to gauge how these plants responded to higher temperatures. However, an analysis of historical records showed that leafing and flowering advanced even more than indicated by their laboratory experiments. The archives show an average of 5-6 days per degree of Celsius increase in temperature, which corresponds with the approximate average global surface temperature increase since 1900.

As planet earth gets warmer, more and more plant and animal populations will be under increased stress. Some will adapt, some will collapse and disappear. Whatever we can do to slow the progress of global warming will give these threatened species more time to adapt to the new conditions, and prevent their vanishing completely.

Climate Change Speeding Up

Three recent studies indicate that climate change is here to stay, it is accelerating, and it will bring major ecological changes to our world.

Global emissions of carbon dioxide rose 5.9% in 2010, the largest year-to-year jump since the industrial revolution began more than 200 years ago. This information is based on a study released in December, 2011, by the Global Carbon Project, an international collaboration of scientists tracking trends in this field. The burning of coal represented more than half of the annual emissions. In 2010, the combustion of fossil fuels (coal and oil) sent 9 billion tons of carbon into earth’s atmosphere.

The United States, which for years produced more CO2 than any other country, now falls into second place behind China, although the U.S. still leads in per capita emissions. In 2010, total carbon emissions in the U.S. were 1.5 billion tons, while China pumped 2.2 billion tons into the air. Developing countries including China and India now account for 57% of all carbon emissions. The study concludes that this trend of ever-rising carbon emissions will make it difficult if not impossible to hold back severe climate change in coming decades.

What are some of the immediate and long-term effects of this trend?

 A December,2011, report based on a climate change computer model developed by researchers at NASA’s JPL and Caltech in Pasadena indicates that by the end of the 21st Century, “… global climate change will modify plant communities covering almost half the earth’s surface.” As earth’s climate warms, animal and plant species in temperate zones will migrate toward the polar regions or to higher elevations. These migrations will pit the migrating species against the species already inhabiting the cooler zones for survival.  Many presently existing species will disappear.

As the report states, “The model projections paint a portrait of increasing ecological change and stress in earth’s biosphere, with many plant and animal species facing increasing competition for survival … Most of earth’s land that is not covered by ice or desert is expected to undergo at least a 30% change in plant cover – changes that will require humans and animals to adapt and often relocate.”

Some areas of the world will change more than others. Among the areas projected to undergo the greatest degree of change are regions of the Himalayas and Tibetan Plateau, equatorial east Africa, Madagascar, the Mediterranean, southern South America, and the Great Lakes and Great Plains areas of North America. To quote the report, “The largest areas of ecological sensitivity and biome changes are found in areas with the most dramatic climate change.” This will be particularly true in North America high altitudes and along the borders of northern forests.

The United Nations Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change Fourth Assessment Report, which was used in the NASA simulation, projects greenhouse gas levels will double, and global temperature will increase 3.6 to 7.2°F (2 to 4°C) by 2100, the same temperature range of warming that occurred following the last Glacial Maximum nearly 20,000 years ago, but 100 times faster. The report paints a picture of a much warmer planet with wet areas being much wetter, and dry areas being much drier.

One sign of things to come is the amazing amount of ice melt being experienced in Greenland, most of which lies within the Arctic Circle. A team of scientists from Ohio State University reported that a network of 50 GPS stations shows that Greenland is rising as the ice sheets that covered this land mass for thousands of years continue to melt at a surprisingly rapid rate. It is estimated that in the year 2010 alone, Greenland lost 100 billion tons of ice through rapid melting. Some areas of southern Greenland rose more than 2 inches (6cm) as the weight of the ice decreased. The rapid ice melt water flows into the ocean, contributing to the rise in sea levels and posing a growing threat to coastal communities and low-lying islands around the world.

There seems to be agreement among leading scientists that human activity is speeding up the natural global warming cycle. To quote the NASA report, “The 2010 emissions increase solidified a trend of ever-rising emissions that scientists fear will make it difficult, if not impossible, to forestall severe climate change in coming decades.” The United Nations Conference on Climate Change in Durban, South Africa, in early December, 2011, attended by representatives of 190 nations, produced a ray of light in the battle to slow the pace of carbon emissions. For the first time, China, India, and the United States agreed to abide by a new emissions reduction treaty to be worked out and signed by 2015, and to go into effect by 2020. Let’s hope the amount of emissions cutback eventually agreed on will be enough to make a difference. Time will tell.